Boris Pustyntsev: The inaction of the authorities is to
blame for the ultra-right's flourishing
Fyodor Gavrilov
"Pchela": You have practical
experience in resisting both the left and the right. What
differences do you see between them?
Boris Pustyntsev: In 1926
Goebbels wrote to Ernst Thдlmann, leader of the German Communists.
There was this passage: "We’re at war with each other, but in fact
we have one and the same enemy—international plutocracy." That
is,
already back then they were ready to see the Communists as their
allies. This is important, the differences play a secondary role
already. When I was in Moscow I saw two flags fluttering side by
side, a red flag and a flag with a stylized swastika—for me that was
an incredible sight. But the resemblance of these two ideologies and
two regimes has always been noted. I don’t recall to which of the
front-line poets these verses belong: "When we finish off the brown
plague, we’ll return home, to face our primary, familiar red
plague."
"Pchela": How do you assess the
current situation in Petersburg?
B.P.: If the national
socialists were to come to power in a large regional center such as
Petersburg that would mean that in fact they were already in power
in Russia. This danger doesn’t exist in Petersburg now, but their
goal isn’t to seize power in Petersburg. Currently, their program is
to come to power by peaceful means in small centers in the
Northwest. They’ve been working on this for a year and a half
already [as of late 1996] and we predicted their success in Pskov.
Most recently they’ve been working on Novgorod. They have a great
deal of money: Yuri Belyaev [see the interview with him in this
digest], with the full connivance of the authorities, got his hands
on a large number of the security firms, and this brings in a very
tidy profit. Moreover, he’s working at dumping prices and the
businessmen go to him themselves. When they realize where they’ve
ended up, they’re already caught. By the way, it’s already been a
year and a half since all talk about coming to power by violent
means has ceased. Anyone who talks about violence they declare a
provocateur. All their energies are concentrated on coming to power
by legal means, through elections. In September of this year [1996],
the Moscow neo-nazis recognized the leadership of the Petersburg
neo-nazis, since Barkashov discredited himself. That means that
Piter has become the capital of Russian Nazism.
"Pchela": Is the renunciation of
violent methods a change of tactics or is it assimilation?
B.P.: It’s a change of
tactics, of course. These forces are very capable of mimicry, of
changing their protective coloration—which they’re always ready to
throw off, by the way. Our government’s bargaining that it will
succeed in grinding down these people, as it was able to do to a
great extent with the Communists, is groundless. These aren’t con
men corrupted by privileges, but criminals, ready to kill, and
ideologically staunch as well.
"Pchela": Both the
ultra-leftists and the ultra-rightists work a great deal with young
people. What can the centrist element of our society do to oppose
this threat?
B.P.: We are constantly
reproached: "You democrats have let the young people slip away from
you; the Nazis and Communists are building playing fields, they’re
always working with young people in their spare time, they hold
lectures, courses for them. Why did you let that happen?" Because
you have to be a fanatic to do something not because your heart
tells you to do it, but because the party orders you to do it. It’s
ridiculous to present such grievances to democrats. Then they say to
us, "Come on, bring together the teenagers in the district, find a
hall, a boxing coach, read them lectures." But they aren’t going to
listen to lectures about human rights. Democrats lack the outlaw
romanticism that kids find attractive. One shouldn’t expect the
democratic community to outplay the extremists on their own
territory. It’s just not possible: this is their home field. The
democrats naturally place their hopes on the government. We have the
Constitution, laws, and we have the right to expect that these laws
are enforced. The inaction of the authorities, and occasional moral
support from our local FSB [the Federal Security Service, the agency
which succeeded the KGB], for example—that’s the reason for the lush
flowering of these forces.
|